The
prevailing opinion is that wars break out again and again simply for various
reasons. Since there is a regicide or two decades peacefully cohabiting ethnic
enmity are sudden, a ship is sunk "by mistake" or a very evil
dictator wants somewhere (raided his poor neighbors sooner you with the war
fewest waited still, until he also did). Moreover, the statement is in space
somewhere that people were just so and therefore war would lead again.
Interestingly, it has taken hold in Germany, a mood, as the topic we could not
weigh more – there are wars but only in the "underdeveloped"
countries.
The
assumption that wars always somehow break out "by accident" is
fundamentally wrong - at least since the last 200 years. We are demonstrated in
2003 excellent basis for the Iraq war, which real interests were behind this
war and how it has tried to bring the population still for approval. It has
never been so easy to see through the process, so you can be absolutely sure
the Bush administration grateful. The majority has become quite clear that it
is primarily about oil and business interests and was not about weapons of mass
destruction. In the U.S. but most of the people actually still believe that
Saddam had something to do with the 11.9.2001 and therefore advocate the war.
Thereto can see what can cause controlled mass media. Of course, Saddam Hussein
is gone now, and this was certainly someone who had committed many crimes.
First, only those crimes had earlier also interest anyone when he was still a
good friend and second, you realize that he does very strong support of the
U.S. and its CIA could come to power.
If you
look more closely, you'll notice that many of the evil dictators receive
(including Hitler) primary massive aid of the same powers (often the USA),
which later in a "war of liberation" used this again. Also on Bin
Laden and the Taliban agree this. We must now not make the mistake of denying
these villains from that basic responsibility for their crimes. They were used
and manipulated, but they are still responsible for what they have done. In all
these cases, however, are those who have supported this, become just as guilty.
Often dictators can then also like to fall into the trap and create a reason to
toast the "war of liberation" against them.
No comments:
Post a Comment